Issue 11
Is it OK to eat salt now?
A paper in JAMA last month reported a meta-analysis of
reducing sodium in 58 trials in hypertensive persons, and 56 trials in
normotensives. The authors concluded that their ‘results do not support a
general recommendation to reduce sodium intake’.
However salt restriction lowers blood pressure in
hypertensives and normotensives. The effect in normotensives makes less credible
the argument that there is a special population of salt-sensitive individuals
and salt restriction should be limited to them.
Observational studies such as INTERSALT show that populations
with lower mean salt intake have a shallower rise of blood pressure with age.
The jury still seems to be out on this one
Another point about salt is that there is, of course, a vested
interest against lowering salt intake? More than 80 per cent of salt in the
British diet comes from processed food. Telling people what is good for them is
not the issue. People do not know how much salt they eat. They are not aware how
much they eat with their breakfast cereal, with their bread, crisps and peanuts,
their canned soups and vegetables. With the advent of the refrigerator, salt is
no longer necessary for storage.
The debate will continue for some time yet.
Back to top
Cuddling is good for babies
Babies suffering from hypothermia will warm up more quickly
if their mothers than cuddle them if they are put in an incubator, according to
a study in the Lancet, this month.
Skin to skin contact, also known as kangaroo care, began in
Bogota, Columbia, where doctors advised mothers to hold and breast-feed their
premature babies because of a shortage of incubators. In the Lancet trial
hypothermic infants did better than those in an incubator. In addition there was
no danger that their body temperature could become too high. Once the skin to
skin babies reached 37 Celsius, they lost heat to their mothers.
Back to top
Antidepressants and the prevention of suicide
There is a lot of pressure from general practitioners and
consultants to use the newer antidepressants despite continuing evidence that
they are not more effective. Recently the argument has focussed on them being
safer in overdose.
Jick et al. (Br Med J. 1995; 310: 215-218.) have examined the
relationship between occurrence of suicide and use of 10 common antidepressants
in a database containing data from more than 4 million patients in the United
Kingdom.
Within 6 months the overall suicide rate was 8.5 per 10,000
person-years. When dothiepin, the most commonly used antidepressant, was
arbitrarily set as an index, only those patients taking fluoxetine
(Prozac/Dista) and mianserin had significantly higher relative risks for
suicide--2.1 and 1.8, respectively.
Case-control analysis determined that only patients taking
fluoxetine had a significantly higher risk. However, this increased risk for
fluoxetine may have resulted from selection bias.
The relative risk of suicide for patients with a history of suicidal
behaviour was 19.2. Men were 2.8 times as likely as women to commit suicide.
Patients receiving high doses of antidepressants were 2.3 times more likely to
commit suicide as those receiving low doses. When the analysis took such factors
as these into account, however, the use of a particular antidepressant did not
influence the risk of suicide.
In the debate on selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors
versus tricyclic drugs the safety in overdose of selective serotonin reuptake
inhibitors has been offered as the most compelling reason for their use as first
line treatment; the work of Jick et al. militates against this argument.
Back to top
Chiropractic for low back pain
Chiropractic includes various techniques used in the hope of
correcting vertebral disc displacements, freeing spinal joint adhesion,
inhibiting nocieptive impulses, or correcting spinal misalignment. Several
national guidelines on the treatment of low back pain recommend spinal
manipulation, including chiropractic, as a symptomatic treatment for acute
uncomplicated cases where pain fails to resolve spontaneously within the first
months.
There are many controlled trials of spinal manipulation and
no fewer than 51 reviews. Surprisingly, in the review which provided the basis
for the recommendations mentioned above, the subset of randomised clinical
trials on acute low back pain did not contain one trial of chiropractic.
A recent systematic review restricted to chiropractic
manipulation included only eight randomised controlled trials, all of which were
methodologically flawed and "did not provide convincing evidence for the
effectiveness of chiropractic for acute or chronic [low back pain]".4
Consequently, we can conclude only that the effectiveness of chiropractic as a
treatment for low back pain has not been established beyond reasonable doubt.
In addition Cervical manipulations are burdened with severe
adverse reactions, such as vertebrobasilar accidents and paralyses due to
fractures. A literature review identified 165 vertebrobasilar accidents,
including 29 deaths. Estimates of their incidence range from 1 per 200 000 to 1
per million cervical manipulations.
The risks of manipulating the lower spine seem to be lower,
with fractures and cauda equina syndrome being the most serious reactions. Nevertheless,
upper spinal manipulation is also occasionally performed in lower back pain.
Finally, there may be important indirect risks associated with chiropractic.
Potential overuse of radiographs by chiropractors is one example; another is the
negative attitude of some chiropractors towards immunisation. Thus, even if
chiropractic manipulation were totally devoid of risks, the approach of
chiropractors may not always be so.
Back to top
Influenza vaccination in the elderly (for those who missed
last month's edition)
As a number of general practitioners did not receive last
month’s Quince we thought it important to repeat a message which is especially
timely at this time of the year.
Several studies have shown substantial savings in direct
medical costs during successive influenza seasons among all elderly people who
had been vaccinated. "Influenza vaccination works, it's inexpensive, and it
saves money". The DoH recommendation is now to give it to all those aged 75
and over. The evidence suggests cost and morbidity savings from giving it to all
over 65s
Back to top
|