Issue 10.
Diabetes care in general practice
A recent (8 Aug) BMJ Article by
Simon Griffin looked at a meta-analysis of trials of diabetes care in general
practice.
Five trials identified included
1058 people with diabetes, receiving hospital outpatient follow up for their
diabetes. Results were heterogeneous between trials.
In shared care schemes featuring
more intensive support through a computerised prompting system for general
practitioners and patients, there was no difference in mortality between care in
hospital and care in general practice. Glycated haemoglobin tended to be lower
in primary care and losses to follow up were significantly lower in primary care
(odds ratio 0.37, 0.22 to 0.61).
However, schemes with less well
developed support for family doctors were associated with adverse outcomes for
patients including poorer follow up, worse glycaemic control, and greater
mortality than in hospital care. Computerised central recall, with prompting for
patients and their family doctors, can achieve standards of care as good as or
better than hospital outpatient care, at least in the short term. The evidence
supports provision of regular prompted recall and review of selected people with
diabetes by willing general practitioners.
Back to top
Violence and mentally ill people
The public perception that mental
disorder is strongly associated with violence drives both legal policy (eg,
civil commitment) and social practice (eg, stigma) toward people with mental
disorders. The present government appears to use the threat of violence as a
means of persuading society to give more resources to mentally ill people, but
it does result in an increase in stigma.
A recent study by Steadman et al.
(Arch Gen Psych) enrolled 1136 male and female adult patients with mental
disorders in a study that monitored violence to others every 10 weeks during
their first year after discharge from the hospital. A comparison group consisted
of 519 people living in the neighbourhoods in which the patients resided after
hospital discharge.
The study showed that for
patients and controls without symptoms of substance abuse there was no
significant difference between the prevalence of violence by patients and the
prevalence of violence by others living in the same neighbourhoods.
Substance abuse symptoms
significantly raised the rate of violence in both the patient and the comparison
groups. A higher portion of patients than of others in their neighbourhoods
reported symptoms of substance abuse.
Violence in both patient and
comparison groups was most frequently targeted at family members and friends,
and most often took place at home.
This study was based in the USA
where substance abuse is more prevalent than in the UK.
Back to top
Cleft Lip and Palate Surgery
The clinical standards advisory
group (CSAG) of the Department of Health has investigated 297 children aged 5
and 277 aged 12 who had all undergone cleft repair in Britain. They found that
40 percent had poor dental bite, less than a third had a good lip appearance at
the age of 13 and under half could speak with normal intelligibility at that
age.
The CSAG stated that of the 57
centres carrying out the operation, only six to eight provided good to excellent
care and the overall results were five to 12 times poorer than in the six
European centres examined. The key factor causing poor training and poor results
was specialists doing one or two operations a year and competition between
plastic and maxillo-facial surgeons.
The report found that not only
are many surgeons continuing to perform operations they are not competent to do,
but they are failing to keep adequate records or perform proper audit.
Only in the area of adveolar bone
grafting is there enough information to compare the two specialties and the
results are not pretty. Fifty percent of cases carried out by plastic surgeons
failed compared to 32 percent done by maxillo-facial surgeons.
For the advice on your nearest
specialist centre contact CLAPA, the Cleft Lip and Palate Association, on 0171
824 8110.
Back to top
Influenza vaccination in the elderly
Most of the deaths due to
influenza occur among people aged over 60 years of age. It is in this group, and
others with particular medical disorders (heart or lung disorders, diabetes,
chronic renal insufficiency or chronic staphylococcal infections), that
influenza vaccination is recommended. The question of how effective the
vaccination policy is in elderly persons has been answered by a randomised
controlled trial published recently in the Journal of the American Medical
association.
People not known to belong to a
high-risk group in 15 practices were asked whether they wished to take part in
the study and just under 2,000 accepted. People were randomly allocated to
active vaccine or control, which were given in double-blind conditions in
November. The active vaccine consisted of two Beijing strains, a Singapore and a
Panama strain.
Participants were serologically
tested for increased antibody levels. The participants and their GPs also
completed forms relating to any symptoms of influenza according to defined
protocols.
In the vaccinated population the
rate of influenza or influenza-like illness was half that in the vaccinated
population compared with the population given a placebo vaccination.
Two cases of influenza are
expected each winter in every 23 people aged over 60 years. One will be
prevented by influenza vaccination. Preventing half the cases in elderly people
is a very positive result.
Several studies have shown
substantial savings in direct medical costs during successive influenza seasons
among elderly people who had been vaccinated.
"Influenza vaccination
works, it's inexpensive, and it saves money".
Back to top
National Small Clinical Effectiveness
Projects
Ten sums of £2,000 are available
for small projects which have a national all-Wales relevance
For further information. Tel: 01222 716841,
Back to top
Sildenafil (Viagra)
The editor has been asked to
remove this section as not representing the views of the Directorates of Public
Health and Patient Care
|