Issue 38.
SIGN guideline on early
management of head injuries
SIGN has produced evidence-based guidance for GPs and A&E
teams on managing head injuries, which sets out when to refer patients for
specialist assessment and treatment.
Trauma is the main cause of mortality in the under-45s in
Scotland, with up to 50% of these deaths caused by head injuries. Head injury is
a common problem with a potentially high morbidity. The patients are often young
with many years of life ahead of them. Early management is a key factor in
determining outcome in head injury. Management should be guided by clinical
assessments and protocols based on the Glasgow Coma Scale and Score, the
guideline says.
The guideline reminds GPs who, and when, to refer with head
injuries. It also recommends a holistic approach, taking into account medical
co-morbidity and social factors, It is a guideline not a protocol, and needs to
be interpreted locally,
Indications for referral to hospital for adults include:
impaired consciousness, i.e. Glasgow Coma Score <15/15, amnesia, neurological
symptoms, clinical evidence of a skull fracture, significant extra-cranial
injuries, a high energy injury, or possible penetrating brain injury. Where the
diagnosis is still uncertain after the first assessment or there is co-morbidity
or adverse social factors, referral is also indicated.
Special attention is given to the assessment and management
of children. Paediatric practice points are highlighted throughout the
guideline, and are also summarised for easy reference.
The guideline points out that the Glasgow Coma Scale is
difficult to apply to children under the age of five, and needs to be
interpreted in these patients by someone with the relevant expertise. Specific
guidance on when to refer children is also included.
Ref
(web)
Back to top
Risk of
gastrointestinal haemorrhage with long term use of aspirin: meta-analysis
This recently published BMJ
article appeared to be interesting enough to outline. The project aimed to
assess the incidence of gastrointestinal haemorrhage associated with long- term
aspirin therapy and to determine the effect of dose reduction and formulation on
the incidence of such haemorrhage. It consisted of a meta-analysis of 24
randomised controlled trials (almost 66,000 participants).
Aspirin was compared with placebo or no treatment, for a
minimum of one year. The main outcome measure was the incidence of
gastrointestinal haemorrhage.
Gastrointestinal haemorrhage occurred in 2.47% of patients
taking aspirin compared with 1.42% taking placebo (odds ratio 1.68; 95%
confidence interval 1.51 to 1.88); the number needed to harm was 106 (82 to 140)
based on an average of 28 months’ therapy. At doses below 163 mg/day,
gastrointestinal haemorrhage occurred in 2.30% of patients
taking aspirin compared with 1.45% taking placebo (1.59; 1.40 to 1.81).
Meta-regression showed no relation between gastrointestinal haemorrhage and
dose. For modified release formulations of aspirin the odds ratio was 1.93 (1.15
to 3.23).
The study shows that long-term therapy with aspirin is
associated with a significant increase in the incidence of gastrointestinal
haemorrhage. No evidence exists that reducing the dose or using modified release
formulations reduces this incidence.
Ref
(web)
Back to top
NICE recommends
zanamivir (Ralenza) for at risk patients
The National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) has
recommended that zanamivir (Relenza) should be used to treat “at risk”
adults when influenza is circulating in the community and if they present within
36 hours of developing symptoms. The institute defines such patients as those
with chronic respiratory disease, significant cardiovascular disease, diabetes,
or a compromised immune system, and those who are aged over 65.
The recommendation by NICE, whose remit covers England and
Wales, reverses the institute’s ruling last year that there was insufficient
evidence of the drug’s efficacy in high risk individuals to make it worth
prescribing on the NHS.
The recommendations were triggered by an overall pooled
analysis of eight trials involving 800 adults at high risk and by new research
by GlaxoWellcome. The pooled analysis showed a reduction in the duration of flu
symptoms by 1.2 days from 6 to 5 days, in the high risk group. It also showed,
in the same group, a 6% reduction in complications in which antibiotics were
needed.
Andrew Dillon, the institute’s chief executive, said: “The
new guidance on zanamivir demonstrates the institute’s commitment to ensuring
that guidance for treating patients is based soundly on evidence”.
Flu is considered to be circulating in the community when
consultations for flu rise above 50 a week per 100,000 population, as monitored
by the Royal College of General Practitioners’ weekly returns monitoring
service. The Public Health Laboratory Service must also have identified the
circulation of a flu virus.
Pharmacists and nurses will be allowed to prescribe zanamivir
under the generalised directions of a doctor, provided they are satisfied that
the patient needs it and satisfies the criteria. Telephoning triaging by
practice nurses may also be set up; the nurses will work to a protocol and ask
standard diagnostic questions.
Ref
(web)
Back to top
Update of CRD's guidance for
undertaking systematic reviews
The NHS Centre for Reviews and dissemination (CRD) first
produced guidance for undertaking systematic reviews in 1996. This was published
as CRD Report Number 4. The guidance provided a framework for carrying out
systematic reviews of effectiveness. Its use was recommended throughout
NHS-funded systematic reviews to ensure a high standard in conducting reviews.
The second edition of Report Number 4 is in preparation.
An electronic preprint of the draft guidance is available at URL:
Ref
(web)
Back to top
|