Issue 28
NICE on zanamivir (Ralenza)
The director of NICE has given the Institute's guidance to doctors in
the NHS about zanamivir, the new anti-flu drug. As this is the first such advice we
thought some detail might be of interest.
He says: This judgment is based on a very careful consideration of the
evidence by our expert committee and we expect doctors to take it fully into account when
exercising their professional judgement. Our guidance does not override the individual
clinical judgement which doctors must make as to what treatments are appropriate and
necessary. We have advised that zanamivir (Relenza) should not be prescribed in the NHS
during the forthcoming 'flu season"
"When we examined the evidence, we found that:
1. the use of zanamivir (Relenza), within 48 hours of the onset of
symptoms of influenza, reduces the duration of the illness, by 24 hours, from a median of
6 to 5 days;
2. because of small numbers of patients in the clinical trials, there
is insufficient information to judge the extent to which the frequency of serious
secondary complications in high risk groups of patients (particularly the elderly and
those with cardiovascular disease, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or
immunosuppression) might be reduced by the use of zanamivir (Relenza)".
"I should also add that the NHS should encourage and where
possible, support the manufacturer in the conduct of the four additional clinical trials
which are currently underway."
Professor Sir Michael Rawlins (Chair of NICE) said that "NICE has
worked hard to develop the guidance that the NHS needs in time for this flu season. I
should stress that this guidance will be reviewed, in advance of the 2000/2001 influenza
season. The next review will cover both zanamivir (Relenza) and a similar product from
Roche oseltamivir (Tamiflu), which is expected to be licensed next year. "
Sir Michael Rawlins added "Whilst I understand that Glaxo Wellcome
will be disappointed at our advice, I would wish to pay tribute to their hard work and
commitment during the Rapid Appraisal process".
"The company are conducting further trials. We very much support
this additional work. NICE and the NHS Research and Development programme (R&D) will
meet the company next week to discuss ways in which additional information on zanamivir's
(relenza) impact on the NHS, can be obtained through further trials in the primary care
context".
"And finally, I would like to stress that those patients Mr.
Dillon has described as 'high risk' should contact their local GP surgery now and enquire
about flu vaccinations.
Background
1. Key points from the NICE guidance. From the evidence NICE assessed
it is clear that the use of zanamivir (Relenza), within 48 hours of the onset of symptoms
of influenza, reduces the duration of the illness, by 24 hours (from a median of 6 to 5
days).
2. For most people flu is an inconvenient bout of illness that in most
cases can be successfully managed, by taking medicines that can be brought from the
chemist.
3. For those in the 'high risk', groups the flu can lead to other problems particularly
respiratory problems. The patients who develop these problems include the elderly, the
very young, those with heart disease and those with lung disease such as asthma. The
problems that develop in patients are known as 'complications'.
4. Complications of flu are responsible for 3- 4000 deaths / year in
patients at 'high risk'. It is important to note that flu does not kill people, it is the
complications of flu that can be dangerous.
5. The NHS recognises that there is this 'high risk' group of patients
for whom the complications of flu can be very serious. It is this group of patients who
are currently offered vaccinations against flu by the NHS.
6. NICE looked very carefully at this group of high risk patients when
making its assessment of zanamivir (Relenza), unfortunately due to the limited numbers of
these patients that were treated with the product in clinical trials, NICE has not been
able to conclude that zanamivir (Relenza) reduces the frequency of these serious
complications in high risk patients. It should be noted that GlaxoWellcome's own advice to
Doctors draws attention to this fact.
7. On the basis of its findings and conclusions, the Institute has
advised that zanamivir (Relenza) should not be prescribed under the NHS during the
1999/2000 influenza season. The NHS will encourage and where possible, support the
manufacturer in the conduct of the four additional clinical trials that are currently
underway.
8. Guidance from NICE will not override the clinical judgement of
Doctors in the treatment of individual patients, but it is expected that it will be taken
into account as representing the views of an eminent body of senior practitioners who have
had the opportunity to consider the available evidence.
9. The National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) is a Special
Health Authority, within the NHS. It is the Institute's job to look at where a product
might be beneficial for patients within the NHS and assess the evidence of both clinical
and cost effectiveness to supports its use. NICE then makes recommendations to the NHS and
patients.
10. The National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) was asked by the Department
of Health and the National Assembly for Wales, to prepare advice, for the NHS, on the use
of zanamivir (Relenza) for the treatment of influenza, during the forthcoming winter. This
guidance was submitted to the Secretary of State and the National Assembly for Wales on
the 4th October 1999
11. Relenza is the first of a new type of drug which aims to decrease
the spread of the virus which causes flu. It must be taken within 48hrs of flu starting.
It is taken over a 5 day period from an inhaler device. (Similar to the sort of device
asthmatics use).
Ref
(web)
Back to top
Complications of breast implants
Concerns regarding the possible role of breast implants (particularly
silicone breast implants) in the development of connective tissue diseases were raised in
the past by case reports of connective tissue diseases in such women. Within the past few
years, epidemiologic studies have begun to appear. Based on a comprehensive literature
search, 15 epidemiologic studies on breast implants and connective tissue diseases, which
satisfied certain basic epidemiologic requirements, were included in a critical
assessment. These studies utilized either the case-control or the cohort study design.
Although each individual study was relatively small, and the
statistical power to detect a modest risk increase in specific categories of connective
tissue diseases was limited, the results of these studies were strikingly consistent.
Meta-analyses of rheumatoid arthritis, systemic sclerosis
(scleroderma), and systemic lupus erythematosus were performed representing a database of
4000 cases of connective tissue diseases. The findings derived from the meta-analyses of
case-control studies were supported by results from cohort studies. These all showed that
there was no increased risk of connective tissue diseases associated with breast implants.
Ref:
web
Back to top
|