The Quince Health Policy Analysis and Evidence-based Public Health
Home
CME | Pubwise | The Quince | Undergrad Teaching | Publishing | Personal
Home
Up

 



The Quince ...

 Issue 48. 
Diabetes black spots and death by post-code
NICE guidance on pressure ulcer prophylaxis

Diabetes black spots and death by post-code

Roper et al in a recent BMJ article present a depressing snapshot of the prospects for diabetic people in the UK today, which shows diabetes to be particularly subject to various inequalities.

Of their 4800 diabetic subjects, a quarter died during the study’s six year span – an overall mortality about 2.2 times the national average. Those who developed diabetes youngest had their lives shortened the most: life expectancy was reduced by nine years for those diagnosed by the age of 40 but by only one year for those diagnosed at 80. Women diagnosed between 55 and 65 years of age lost two more years of life than did men. Finally, mortality tracked closely with socioeconomic deprivation, rising steadily from 1.3 times the national average in districts with the most affluent postcodes to 2.3 times in the poorest.

Diabetes is notoriously complicated and unpredictable and demands time and attention to detail as well as a sound understanding of the disease and its management. This paper comes at a time when the fashion in the UK is to devolve the routine care of diabetes away from specialist centres and into the community, where responsibility is too often delegated to practice nurses, who may have little or no specialist training.

This timely reminder of the dangers of diabetes should prompt a careful look at the wisdom of that strategy. The systematic use of diabetes registers, as in this study, and comparisons with other countries should help us to identify the best way to look after this difficult disease.

The situation is hard enough to cope with now. Unfortunately, things are set to get worse. Most of Roper’s patients (nominally 85%) had type 2 diabetes, which, nourished by the obesity pandemic, is on the march throughout the world.

Because of the projected increase in type 2 diabetes the number of diabetic patients worldwide id predicted to double within the next 15 years, to over 100 million. Worse still, type 2 diabetes is not the disease it used to be. It is no longer safe to assume (as did Roper et al) that type 2 diabetes is “maturity onset”: it is now appearing in ever younger subjects and already accounts for one third of newly diagnosed diabetic people under 20 years of age in some parts of the United States.

Roper calls for the national service framework (which will soon pronounce on the UK’s strategy for managing diabetes) to take their findings into consideration. They also invoke the St Vincent Declaration and its guiding principle that those with diabetes should enjoy “a life approaching normal expectation in quality and quantity”.

We can only hope that the service framework and its counterparts in other countries can rise to these difficult challenges and that, against expectation, public health measures will be able to turn the rising tide of obesity. If not, we shall find ourselves looking back with longing at the good old days portrayed by Roper et al, and St Vincent will turn out to be the patron saint of unfulfilled aspirations.

Ref (web)

Back to top

NICE guidance on pressure ulcer prophylaxis

This note contains some, but not all of the NICE guidance. The full text is at

www.nice.org.uk

The recommendations in the guideline are graded (1) Generally consistent finding in a majority of multiple acceptable studies (2) Based on a single acceptable study, or a weak or inconsistent finding in multiple acceptable studies (3) Limited scientific evidence. This includes expert opinion.

The note below concentrates on recommendations of (2) and above. There are, sadly, not all that many. It is obviously an area of practice wide open for new research. Please note that the guideline contains many more recommendations.

Risk assessment should be carried out by personnel who have undergone appropriate training and know how to initiate and maintain correct and suitable preventive measures (3).

The timing of risk assessment should be based on each individual case. However, it should take place within six hours of the start of admission to the episode of care (3).

All formal assessments of risk should be documented/recorded and made accessible to all members of the inter-disciplinary team (3)

Risk assessment tools should only be used as an aide memoire and should not replace clinical judgment (1).

Risk factors 2.3.1. An individual's potential to develop pressure ulcers may be influenced by the following intrinsic risk factors which therefore should be considered when performing a risk assessment (2): - reduced mobility or immobility; - sensory impairment; - acute illness; - level of consciousness; - extremes of age; - vascular disease; - severe chronic or terminal illness; - previous history of pressure damage; - malnutrition and dehydration.

Extrinsic risk factors are involved in tissue damage and should be removed or diminished to prevent injury: pressure; shearing and friction (2).

The potential of an individual to develop pressure ulcers may be exacerbated by the following factors which therefore should be considered when performing a risk assessment: medication and moisture to the skin (2).

Skin inspection should occur regularly and the frequency determined in response to changes in the individual's condition in relation to either deterioration or recovery (3).

Individual patients who are willing and able should be encouraged, following education, to inspect their own skin (3).

Individuals who are wheelchair users should use a mirror to inspect the areas that they cannot see easily or get others to inspect them (3).

The following should NOT be used as pressure relieving aids: water filled gloves; synthetic sheepskins; genuine sheepskins and doughnut-type devices (3).

No seat cushion has been shown to perform better than another, so this guidelines makes no recommendation about which type to use for pressure redistribution purposes (3).

All health care professionals should receive relevant training or education in pressure ulcer risk assessment and prevention (2).

Patient/carer education should include providing information on the following (3): -the risk factors associated with them developing pressure ulcers; -the sites that are of the greatest risk to them of pressure damage; -how to inspect skin and recognise skin changes; -how to care for skin; methods for pressure relief/reduction; -where they can seek further advice and assistance should they need it; -emphasise the need for immediate visits to a health care professional should signs of damage be noticed

Back to top

 

Last updated:

Copyright 2003 | Norman Vetter


Send mail to njvetter@hotmail.com with questions or comments