Issue 96
Cancer guidelines from NICE
New guidelines on referring patients
with suspected cancer in England and Wales have been launched by the
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). The
document is intended to help to ensure that people wherever they
live, who present in primary care with suspected cancer will benefit
from a consistent and coherent approach, based on the best available
evidence.
The guidelines update previous
recommendations from the Department of Health published in 2000,
taking account of new evidence from research and from audits. They
make recommendations on the diagnostic and referral process for the
most common cancers, including lung cancer, breast cancer, skin
cancer, upper and lower gastrointestinal cancer, and cancer in
children and young people.
For each cancer the guidelines list
symptoms that should alert GPs to referring patients either
immediately (acute admission or referral within a few hours),
urgently (within two weeks), or non-urgently (all other referrals).
The recommendations are each graded according to the evidence on
which they are based.
Although deaths from some cancers
are falling, nearly 140,000 people died from cancer in England and
Wales in 2003. A report from the National Audit Office on cancer
services in England published last year found that patients in
England with cancer of the breast or bowel tended to have more
advanced cancer at the time of diagnosis than in some other
countries. Older people and those from deprived areas were more
likely to have more advanced cancer at diagnosis.
The NHS Cancer Plan identifies early
referral as an important element in the improvement of care for
people with cancer. This is, therefore, a particularly important
guideline which may improve this aspect of the cancer care pathway.
The guideline also covers the
support that staff in primary care should offer to people who have
symptoms that could be cancer. Offering patients the choice of
seeing a male or female GP; proving them with information about the
risks and benefits of tests so that they can be involved in making
decisions about tests if they wish; and giving details about what to
expect when they see a specialist, including their possible
diagnosis, are among the recommendations.
The guidelines will help GPs in
England and Wales improve the accuracy and speed of the referral
process. They will also ensure that those waiting for their referral
appointment are given the information and support they need to help
reduce uncertainty during what can be an extremely anxious time. We
hope that all GPs are made aware of these guidelines and that they
are acted on without delay.
Web:source
Back to top
Chloramphenicol eye drops
Chloramphenicol eye drops are unnecessary for uncomplicated
conjunctivitis
They are no better than placebo for
children with
conjunctivitis, a randomised trial has found. The authors
think primary care doctors should stop prescribing
chloramphenicol
eye drops for children with uncomplicated conjunctivitis and
should instead tell parents to keep the affected eye
clean and to come
back if it doesn't get better.
The trial, which included
326 children aged 12 years or less, reported clinical
cure rates of 83%
(128/155) among children given placebo drops for seven
days compared with 86% (140/162) among children given
chloramphenicol.
Four fifths of the children had bacterial conjunctivitis. Children
given placebo drops were no more likely to relapse and
no less likely to
report side effects than the others, but they took
about a third of a day longer to get better.
This is the first trial done
exclusively in primary care, where
chloramphenicol eye drops are a standard treatment for
conjunctivitis in
children. Changing doctors' prescribing habits and patients'
expectations will be difficult, particularly in
countries such as
the UK where schools and nurseries often exclude children
until they are treated. The economic arguments are
compelling,
however. Every year one million children present to UK general
practitioners with conjunctivitis; that's over a
million consultations
and potentially a million prescriptions.
Web:
Source
Back
to top
Lack of targets leads to underperformance
Many services provided by the NHS in
England and Wales have
improved over the past year, but others, including mental
health, sexual
health, maternity, and dental services, have "been left
behind," according to an annual report on the state of
health care. The
report, presented to parliament this week, said that
a lack of targets or requirement to collect information
in these areas
may underlie the poorer performance.
It says that the NHS still has a
long way to go to achieve a
"patient-led" service.
The annual report from the Healthcare
Commission, an
independent body that inspects and reviews various
aspects of health
services, focused for the first time on the
experience of
patients. It reviewed existing evidence on the
experience of
patients, including the commission's own surveys
of patients. The
results showed that patients were highly satisfied with
many NHS services,
with more than 90% of patients who took part
in the surveys rating
their overall care as good, very good,
or excellent. However,
there were some exceptions. Only 76%
of patients in mental
health services were satisfied with their
care.
Anna Walker, chief executive of the
Healthcare Commission, said,
"Clear improvements in
prevention and treatment have occurred,
whether there is some
form of target or national service framework.
There has been less
progress in areas not so thoroughly covered
by targets."
The report warned that less than
half the people with mental
health problems
surveyed in 2004 said they had access to crisis
care, such as an
out-of-hours phone number of a mental health
professional, when
they needed it.
Also, only two thirds of community
based crisis resolution teams
operated around the
clock, the report found, even though the
purpose of these
services is to prevent the need to hospitalise
adults with acute
psychiatric crises by providing 24 hour community
based treatment.
The report found long waiting times
for sexual health services,
with 28% of people who
needed to be seen urgently having to
wait more than 48
hours and 29% of people who had symptoms of
sexual infection
waiting more than two weeks.
The report highlighted major
problems in some maternity services.
It warned that three
independent investigations into maternity
services over the past
two years had shown a range of problems,
including inadequate
support for women who do not speak English,
overcrowding, and poor
standards of cleanliness
Web:
Source
Back to top
|